The Ghana Chamber of Mines has challenged claims by the Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Sammy Gyamfi, that large-scale mining companies repatriate less than 20% of their mineral export proceeds to Ghana.

In a statement responding to remarks made at a ceremony marking the sale of the Damang Gold Mine’s first gold output to the Bank of Ghana through GoldBod, the Chamber described the figure as “materially misleading”.

Speaking at the event, Mr Gyamfi contrasted the foreign exchange contribution of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) with that of the large-scale mining sector.

“But in sharp contrast to that, the large-scale mining companies in the country only sold just about 10% of their output, just about 10 tons of the almost 100 metric tons of gold they produced in 2025,” he said.

“If you add the physical gold stocks they sold to the country through the Bank of Ghana to the foreign exchange they repatriated back, you will not get more than 20%.”

Mr Gyamfi argued that although large-scale mining firms produced nearly $10 billion worth of gold in 2025, Ghana retained only a small portion of the value generated because many multinational mining firms are allowed under existing agreements to keep a substantial share of export proceeds abroad.

“And the agreements they’ve signed with the Republic allows them to retain, in some cases, 100% of the proceeds of their gold sales outside Ghana. In some cases, 80% retention, 90% retention. So what comes back into the economy is very little,” he stated.

The Chamber of Mines, however, said the calculation used by the GoldBod CEO captures only transactions conducted directly with the Bank of Ghana and ignores significant inflows channelled through commercial banks operating in the country.

“The cited statistic is derived solely from bullion gold and foreign exchange sold directly to the Bank of Ghana,” the Chamber said.

“This approach captures only one channel of forex repatriation and excludes substantial inflows through the commercial banking system.”

The Chamber explained that mining companies repatriate export earnings through two recognised channels: direct sales of foreign exchange and bullion gold to the Bank of Ghana, and transfers through commercial banks domiciled in Ghana. It argued that any accurate assessment of the mining sector’s foreign exchange contribution must account for both channels.

According to the Chamber, a significant portion of export proceeds repatriated through commercial banks is used to meet local obligations, including royalty payments to the government, utility payments, fuel purchases, employee salaries, payments to local suppliers, and corporate social investments in mining communities. Some of the foreign currency brought into the country is also converted into Ghana cedis, which the Chamber says supports domestic foreign exchange liquidity and exchange rate stability.

“Based on industry data, approximately 70 per cent of mineral export proceeds from the Chamber’s producing members is returned to Ghana through a combination of the central bank and commercial banking channels,” the statement said.

The Chamber further distinguished between “gross forex repatriation” — the total amount of foreign exchange returned to Ghana — and “net forex retention”, which refers to the balance remaining after companies settle external obligations. It maintained that gross repatriation is the appropriate measure when assessing the mining sector’s contribution to Ghana’s foreign exchange position, in line with balance-of-payments accounting principles.

The statement also referenced a previous Bank of Ghana policy that granted the central bank a right of first refusal on foreign exchange intended for sale to commercial banks, arguing that the policy itself acknowledged the importance of the commercial banking channel in forex inflows.

The Chamber called for the publication of “a disaggregated and transparent account” of mineral sector foreign exchange flows through both the central bank and commercial banks to improve public understanding and policy discussions.

The disagreement highlights ongoing debates over how much value Ghana retains from its mineral resources, particularly at a time when the government is pursuing reforms aimed at strengthening foreign exchange reserves and increasing local benefits from gold production.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

Tags:

Chamber of Mines Disagrees with GoldBod Boss on Gold Export Money

Suggested for you

More Stories

Adomako-Mensah criticizes PURC for not addressing recent power outages

Political interference is biggest threat to local governance – CHALOG President

Julius Debrah Introduces Presidential Delivery Unit To Check Government Promises

Adomako-Mensah questions Mahama's 1,200MW power plant announcement

NPP's Kwabena Frimpong criticizes government's 'unfair' health worker recruitment

Gospel veteran Dr. Collins Nyantachie returns with new album 'Obe Tumi Ay3'

Discussion